Ruby/doorkeeper/0.7.0
Doorkeeper is an OAuth 2 provider for Rails and Grape.
https://rubygems.org/gems/doorkeeper
UNKNOWN
6 Security Vulnerabilities
Doorkeeper is vulnerable to replay attacks
- https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-6582
- https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-3m6r-39p3-jq25
- https://github.com/doorkeeper-gem/doorkeeper/issues/875
- https://github.com/doorkeeper-gem/doorkeeper/releases/tag/v4.2.0
- http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/138430/Doorkeeper-4.1.0-Token-Revocation.html
- http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2016/Aug/105
- http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/539268/100/0/threaded
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/92551
- https://github.com/rubysec/ruby-advisory-db/blob/master/gems/doorkeeper/CVE-2016-6582.yml
- https://web.archive.org/web/20170214021758/http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/92551
- https://web.archive.org/web/20201207202519/http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/539268/100/0/threaded
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/08/19/2
The Doorkeeper gem before 4.2.0 for Ruby might allow remote attackers to conduct replay attacks or revoke arbitrary tokens by leveraging failure to implement the OAuth 2.0 Token Revocation specification.
Doorkeeper contains Cross-site Request Forgery
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in doorkeeper before 1.4.1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims for requests that read a user OAuth authorization code via unknown vectors.
Doorkeeper Improper Authentication vulnerability
- https://github.com/doorkeeper-gem/doorkeeper/security/advisories/GHSA-7w2c-w47h-789w
- https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-34246
- https://github.com/doorkeeper-gem/doorkeeper/issues/1589
- https://github.com/doorkeeper-gem/doorkeeper/pull/1646
- https://github.com/doorkeeper-gem/doorkeeper/releases/tag/v5.6.6
- https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8252#section-8.6
- https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-7w2c-w47h-789w
- https://github.com/rubysec/ruby-advisory-db/blob/master/gems/doorkeeper/CVE-2023-34246.yml
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/07/msg00016.html
OAuth RFC 8252 says https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8252#section-8.6
the authorization server SHOULD NOT process authorization requests automatically without user consent or interaction, except when the identity of the client can be assured. This includes the case where the user has previously approved an authorization request for a given client id
But Doorkeeper automatically processes authorization requests without user consent for public clients that have been previously approved. Public clients are inherently vulnerable to impersonation, their identity cannot be assured.
Issue https://github.com/doorkeeper-gem/doorkeeper/issues/1589
Fix https://github.com/doorkeeper-gem/doorkeeper/pull/1646
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in doorkeeper 1.4.0 and earlier.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in doorkeeper 1.4.0 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the user's OAuth autorization code. This vulnerability has been assigned the CVE identifier CVE-2014-8144.
Doorkeeper's endpoints didn't have CSRF protection. Any HTML document on the Internet can then read a user's authorization code with arbitrary scope from any Doorkeeper-compatible Rails app you are logged in.
Doorkeeper Improper Authentication vulnerability
OAuth RFC 8252 says https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8252#section-8.6
the authorization server SHOULD NOT process authorization requests automatically without user consent or interaction, except when the identity of the client can be assured. This includes the case where the user has previously approved an authorization request for a given client id
But Doorkeeper automatically processes authorization requests without user consent for public clients that have been previous approved. Public clients are inherently vulnerable to impersonation, their identity cannot be assured.
Issue https://github.com/doorkeeper-gem/doorkeeper/issues/1589
Fix https://github.com/doorkeeper-gem/doorkeeper/pull/1646
Doorkeeper Gem for Ruby stores sensitive information in production logs
Doorkeeper Gem for Ruby contains a flaw in lib/doorkeeper/engine.rb. The issue is due to the program storing sensitive information in production logs. This may allow a local attacker to gain access to sensitive information.
121 Other Versions
Version | License | Security | Released | |
---|---|---|---|---|
5.8.0 | MIT | 2024-10-31 - 07:54 | 17 days | |
5.7.1 | MIT | 2024-06-25 - 14:54 | 5 months | |
5.7.0 | MIT | 2024-04-24 - 10:44 | 7 months | |
5.6.9 | MIT | 2024-02-14 - 07:54 | 9 months | |
5.6.8 | MIT | 2023-12-01 - 16:02 | 12 months | |
5.6.7 | MIT | 2023-11-23 - 07:56 | 12 months | |
5.6.6 | MIT | 2023-03-29 - 07:19 | over 1 year | |
5.6.5 | MIT | 2 | 2023-02-22 - 09:00 | over 1 year |
5.6.4 | MIT | 2 | 2023-01-31 - 07:24 | almost 2 years |
5.6.3 | MIT | 2 | 2023-01-30 - 12:01 | almost 2 years |
5.6.2 | MIT | 2 | 2022-11-29 - 08:19 | almost 2 years |
5.6.1 | MIT | 2 | 2022-11-28 - 08:20 | almost 2 years |
5.6.0 | MIT | 2 | 2022-09-08 - 06:32 | about 2 years |
5.6.0.rc2 | MIT | 2 | 2022-05-26 - 07:43 | over 2 years |
5.6.0.rc1 | MIT | 2 | 2022-02-04 - 07:10 | almost 3 years |
5.5.4 | MIT | 2 | 2021-10-05 - 13:57 | about 3 years |
5.5.3 | MIT | 2 | 2021-09-23 - 07:09 | about 3 years |
5.5.2 | MIT | 2 | 2021-06-11 - 07:26 | over 3 years |
5.5.1 | MIT | 2 | 2021-04-06 - 15:52 | over 3 years |
5.5.0 | MIT | 2 | 2021-02-19 - 06:35 | over 3 years |
5.5.0.rc2 | MIT | 2 | 2021-01-21 - 17:31 | almost 4 years |
5.5.0.rc1 | MIT | 2 | 2020-08-04 - 07:18 | over 4 years |
5.4.0 | MIT | 2 | 2020-05-11 - 10:46 | over 4 years |
5.4.0.rc2 | MIT | 2 | 2020-05-02 - 13:27 | over 4 years |
5.4.0.rc1 | MIT | 2 | 2020-04-08 - 07:40 | over 4 years |
5.3.3 | MIT | 2 | 2020-05-07 - 19:17 | over 4 years |
5.3.2 | MIT | 2 | 2020-05-02 - 13:14 | over 4 years |
5.3.1 | MIT | 4 | 2020-02-09 - 09:42 | almost 5 years |
5.3.0 | MIT | 4 | 2020-01-29 - 14:54 | almost 5 years |
5.2.6 | MIT | 2 | 2020-05-07 - 19:20 | over 4 years |
5.2.5 | MIT | 2 | 2020-05-02 - 13:25 | over 4 years |
5.2.4 | MIT | 3 | 2020-02-09 - 09:49 | almost 5 years |
5.2.3 | MIT | 3 | 2019-12-12 - 14:46 | almost 5 years |
5.2.2 | MIT | 3 | 2019-11-10 - 10:17 | about 5 years |
5.2.1 | MIT | 3 | 2019-09-17 - 13:32 | about 5 years |
5.2.0 | MIT | 3 | 2019-09-16 - 08:31 | about 5 years |
5.2.0.rc3 | MIT | 2 | 2019-08-28 - 07:35 | about 5 years |
5.2.0.rc2 | MIT | 2 | 2019-06-17 - 08:27 | over 5 years |
5.2.0.rc1 | MIT | 2 | 2019-05-23 - 15:17 | over 5 years |
5.1.2 | MIT | 2 | 2020-10-19 - 07:54 | about 4 years |
5.1.1 | MIT | 2 | 2020-05-02 - 13:38 | over 4 years |
5.1.0 | MIT | 3 | 2019-04-17 - 14:35 | over 5 years |
5.1.0.rc2 | MIT | 2 | 2019-03-22 - 07:49 | over 5 years |
5.1.0.rc1 | MIT | 2 | 2019-01-17 - 08:41 | almost 6 years |
5.0.3 | MIT | 2 | 2020-05-05 - 08:43 | over 4 years |
5.0.2 | MIT | 3 | 2018-10-25 - 09:25 | about 6 years |
5.0.1 | MIT | 3 | 2018-10-10 - 14:08 | about 6 years |
5.0.0 | MIT | 3 | 2018-08-24 - 13:55 | about 6 years |
5.0.0.rc2 | MIT | 2 | 2018-07-17 - 10:01 | over 6 years |
5.0.0.rc1 | MIT | 2 | 2018-06-11 - 11:42 | over 6 years |
4.4.3 | MIT | 2 | 2018-09-19 - 08:41 | about 6 years |
4.4.2 | MIT | 2 | 2018-08-20 - 15:24 | about 6 years |
4.4.1 | MIT | 2 | 2018-07-27 - 14:58 | over 6 years |
4.4.0 | MIT | 2 | 2018-07-17 - 09:57 | over 6 years |
4.3.2 | MIT | 4 | 2018-03-28 - 09:49 | over 6 years |
4.3.1 | MIT | 4 | 2018-03-03 - 09:44 | over 6 years |
4.3.0 | MIT | 4 | 2018-02-23 - 15:06 | over 6 years |
4.2.6 | MIT | 4 | 2017-05-26 - 00:08 | over 7 years |
4.2.5 | MIT | 6 | 2017-02-12 - 16:09 | almost 8 years |
4.2.0 | MIT | 6 | 2016-08-18 - 21:15 | about 8 years |
4.1.0 | MIT | 7 | 2016-07-29 - 23:09 | over 8 years |
4.0.0 | MIT | 7 | 2016-07-01 - 21:31 | over 8 years |
4.0.0.rc4 | MIT | 7 | 2016-05-17 - 18:14 | over 8 years |
4.0.0.rc3 | MIT | 7 | 2016-04-20 - 22:23 | over 8 years |
4.0.0.rc2 | MIT | 7 | 2016-03-03 - 01:56 | over 8 years |
4.0.0.rc1 | MIT | 7 | 2016-02-26 - 03:36 | over 8 years |
3.1.0 | MIT | 7 | 2015-12-23 - 18:14 | almost 9 years |
3.0.1 | MIT | 7 | 2015-09-24 - 03:49 | about 9 years |
3.0.0 | MIT | 7 | 2015-07-30 - 19:09 | over 9 years |
3.0.0.rc2 | MIT | 7 | 2015-07-09 - 22:32 | over 9 years |
3.0.0.rc1 | MIT | 7 | 2015-05-12 - 03:18 | over 9 years |
2.2.2 | MIT | 7 | 2015-07-30 - 19:15 | over 9 years |
2.2.1 | MIT | 7 | 2015-05-05 - 02:12 | over 9 years |
2.2.0 | MIT | 7 | 2015-04-19 - 12:54 | over 9 years |
2.1.4 | MIT | 7 | 2015-03-27 - 16:14 | over 9 years |
2.1.3 | MIT | 7 | 2015-03-01 - 22:34 | over 9 years |
2.1.2 | MIT | 7 | 2015-02-26 - 02:39 | over 9 years |
2.1.1 | MIT | 8 | 2015-02-06 - 16:12 | almost 10 years |
2.1.0 | MIT | 8 | 2015-01-13 - 20:40 | almost 10 years |
2.0.1 | MIT | 6 | 2014-12-17 - 19:44 | almost 10 years |
2.0.0 | MIT | 6 | 2014-12-16 - 21:03 | almost 10 years |
2.0.0.rc3 | MIT | 7 | 2014-12-14 - 16:59 | almost 10 years |
2.0.0.rc2 | MIT | 7 | 2014-12-09 - 13:18 | almost 10 years |
2.0.0.alpha1 | MIT | 7 | 2014-10-11 - 21:04 | about 10 years |
1.4.2 | MIT | 5 | 2015-03-03 - 04:09 | over 9 years |
1.4.1 | MIT | 5 | 2014-12-17 - 13:13 | almost 10 years |
1.4.0 | MIT | 6 | 2014-07-31 - 15:49 | over 10 years |
1.3.1 | MIT | 8 | 2014-07-06 - 14:50 | over 10 years |
1.3.0 | MIT | 8 | 2014-05-23 - 15:19 | over 10 years |
1.2.0 | MIT | 8 | 2014-05-03 - 13:31 | over 10 years |
1.1.0 | MIT | 6 | 2014-03-29 - 17:43 | over 10 years |
1.0.0 | MIT | 6 | 2014-01-13 - 17:53 | almost 11 years |
1.0.0.rc2 | MIT | 6 | 2014-01-09 - 20:02 | almost 11 years |
1.0.0.rc1 | MIT | 6 | 2013-12-11 - 19:02 | almost 11 years |
0.7.4 | MIT | 6 | 2013-12-01 - 18:57 | almost 11 years |
0.7.3 | MIT | 6 | 2013-10-04 - 22:58 | about 11 years |
0.7.2 | MIT | 6 | 2013-09-11 - 00:43 | about 11 years |
0.7.1 | MIT | 6 | 2013-08-30 - 21:34 | about 11 years |
0.7.0 | UNKNOWN | 6 | 2013-08-22 - 03:04 | about 11 years |
0.6.7 | UNKNOWN | 6 | 2013-01-13 - 18:48 | almost 12 years |